Word Generation: A Research-Driven Approach to Literacy and Civic Engagement

Word Generation: A Research-Driven Approach to Literacy and Civic Engagement

Word Generation (WordGen) has emerged as a flagship literacy program for fostering academic language and critical thinking across disciplines. By addressing real-world, controversial topics, WordGen bridges the gap between literacy development and civic education, empowering students to articulate their thoughts, build arguments, and engage in meaningful discussions.

How WordGen Weekly Works

Each WordGen Weekly contains a high-interest passage about a controversial topic. Through the text, the students are introduced to selected academic vocabulary words. The text and the vocabulary list are the basis for discussion and weekly writing.

‍

‍

Example WordGen topics and vocabulary

Unit 1.05: Does rap music have a negative impact on youth?
considerable • contribute • demonstrate • sufficient • valid  

Unit 2.07: Should the government fund embryonic stem cell research?
embryo • paralyzed • theory • investigate • obtain  

Unit 3.19: When is it okay to lie?
conceive • unethical • benefit • detect • rationalize  

Engaging in Controversial Issues: Building Communicative Self-Efficacy

One of WordGen’s most transformative outcomes is its ability to boost students' confidence in discussing complex and controversial topics. In the study "Assessing Adolescents’ Communicative Self-Efficacy to Discuss Controversial Issues" (Lawrence, Lin, Snow, & Taylor, 2016), researchers investigated how WordGen influenced students’ ability to navigate sensitive debates, such as the ethics of embryonic stem cell research or the societal effects of rap music.

Using a randomized controlled trial (RCT), the study assessed over 2,000 middle school students who participated in WordGen’s weekly activities. The results were striking: students in the intervention group demonstrated significantly higher self-efficacy in articulating their opinions, even on contentious issues. This finding was supported by surveys, classroom observations, and pre-and post-tests that measured their confidence in formulating and defending arguments.

The study concluded that WordGen not only enhances vocabulary and academic discourse but also equips students with the social-emotional skills needed for civic engagement. These outcomes align with the program’s mission to prepare students for informed, active citizenship.

Vocabulary Growth Across Diverse Learners

WordGen’s emphasis on repeated and contextualized exposure to academic language has consistently yielded impressive results. For instance, the study "Generating Vocabulary Knowledge for At-Risk Middle School Readers" (Lawrence et al., 2014) highlighted the program’s ability to support at-risk learners, including English learners (ELs). Using growth curve modeling, the researchers found that WordGen accelerated vocabulary acquisition, with effect sizes of 0.27 to 0.35 standard deviations for ELs—a substantial improvement compared to control groups.

In a longitudinal follow-up, "Language Proficiency, Home Language Status, and English Vocabulary Development" (Lawrence, Capotosto, Branum-Martin, & Snow, 2012), students from bilingual households showed sustained vocabulary gains, highlighting WordGen’s adaptability to diverse linguistic contexts. These findings reinforce the program’s value in addressing educational inequities.

Argumentative Writing: A Link to Higher-Order Thinking

Another key finding from WordGen research is its impact on students’ ability to produce higher-order arguments in writing. In "Cognitive and Linguistic Features of Adolescent Argumentative Writing: Do Connectives Signal More Complex Reasoning" (Taylor, Lawrence, Connor, & Snow, 2018), the authors demonstrated that students who used of logical connectives (e.g., "however," "therefore") had more sophisticated arguments in thier wirting. These linguistic features signaled more sophisticated reasoning, as students learned to link ideas, evaluate evidence, and construct nuanced arguments.

This study highlighted how academic language supports deeper cognitive processes, making WordGen a critical tool for enhancing both literacy and critical thinking.

Civic Awareness Through Literacy

The intersection of literacy and civic education is a defining feature of WordGen. In the study "Teaching Urban Youth About Controversial Issues" (Lin, Lawrence, & Snow, 2015), researchers explored how the program fosters critical thinking and civic awareness. By engaging students in discussions about real-world dilemmas, WordGen encouraged them to evaluate multiple perspectives and build evidence-based arguments. This aligns with findings from the communicative self-efficacy study (Lawrence et al., 2016), which highlighted the program’s role in preparing students to engage in respectful, productive dialogue.

Why WordGen Works: Evidence and Mechanisms

WordGen’s success is rooted in its evidence-based design:

• High-Interest Topics: The integration of controversial, real-world issues captures students' attention and motivates deeper engagement.
• Active Learning: Structured discussions and writing tasks allow students to practice and apply new vocabulary in meaningful contexts.
• Teacher Support: Professional development ensures effective implementation, maximizing the program's impact.

The study "Word Generation Randomized Trial: Discussion Mediates the Impact of Program Treatment on Academic Word Learning" (Lawrence et al., 2015) provided critical insights into how teacher-led discussions amplify the program’s effects. By fostering interactive classroom environments, WordGen supports vocabulary retention and encourages students to think critically.

Scaling WordGen: A Call to Action

With its robust research foundation, WordGen offers schools and districts a scalable, adaptable solution for improving literacy and fostering civic readiness. Free resources, including detailed implementation guides, are available through the Strategic Education Research Partnership (SERP) Institute.

References

1. Taylor, K. S., Lawrence, J. F., Connor, C. M., & Snow, C. E. (2018). Cognitive and linguistic features of adolescent argumentative writing: Do connectives signal more complex reasoning? Reading and Writing, 31(3), 547–567. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-018-9898
2. Lawrence, J. F., Lin, A. R., Snow, C. E., & Taylor, K. S. (2016). Assessing adolescents’ communicative self-efficacy to discuss controversial issues: Findings from a randomized study of the Word Generation program. Theory and Research in Social Education, 44(3), 316–343. https://doi.org/10.1080/00933104.2016.1203852
3. Lawrence, J. F., Rolland, R. G., Branum-Martin, L., & Snow, C. E. (2014). Generating vocabulary knowledge for at-risk middle school readers: Contrasting program effects and growth trajectories. Journal of Education for Students Placed at Risk, 19(2), 76–97. https://doi.org/10.1080/10824669.2014.95883
4. Lawrence, J. F., Capotosto, L., Branum-Martin, L., & Snow, C. E. (2012). Language proficiency, home-language status, and English vocabulary development: A longitudinal follow-up of the Word Generation program. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 15(3), 437–451. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728911000393
5. Lin, A. R., Lawrence, J. F., & Snow, C. E. (2015). Teaching urban youth about controversial issues: Pathways to becoming active and informed citizens. Citizenship, Social and Economics Education, 14(2), 103–119. https://doi.org/10.1177/2047173415600606
6. Lawrence, J. F., Crosson, A. C., Paré-Blagoev, E. J., & Snow, C. E. (2015). Word Generation randomized trial: Discussion mediates the impact of program treatment on academic word learning. American Educational Research Journal, 52(4), 750–786. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831215579485

‍